Sunday, June 3, 2012

And Will You Succeed? Yes Indeed, Yes Indeed…



So, I just completed a graduate degree program and am now officially an “MPH”… a Minister of Proper Hugs*, a Magician with Purple Hats, a Mistress of Polyester Hip-huggers, and a Master of Public Health.  I mention this because it has become the impetus for some blahg-worthy thoughts about the role of advanced degrees and the valuation on formal education in society.

When I decided to attend Columbia University in the summer of 2010, I found myself inexplicably uncomfortable with sharing the news.  It seemed that far too often I experienced a level of (not necessarily welcomed) awe from people who I would tell, which for a long time led to my withholding the details of my upcoming plans in an effort to avoid the reaction that caused me to blush and stutter.

In retrospect, my reluctance to broadcast the details of my matriculation was not because I was not proud of this accomplishment or eternally grateful for having had this privilege and opportunity, it was because I do not view it as any more awe-invoking than the many other paths for learning and development that exist and are necessary for our society to thrive.  This is a notion that I have struggled to define and articulate in the face of a deeply engrained high appraisal on a formal academic path in our society.

The human race has an extremely long legacy of placing value on certain types of intelligences.  This legacy now pervades every element of how our societies function and I view it as a tragic loss for people overall.  By “intelligences” I am referring to the different ways that we learn, the different passions that we have, and the different strengths that we all bring to the table, both by nature and by nurture.  That said, I’ve noticed that somewhere along the way (long, long ago) we decided that men’s intelligences are superior to women’s, and that intelligences of white people are superior to those of people of color.

These developments have led to the destruction of one of humankind’s most valuable assets, that of diverse worldviews and intelligences.  Sometimes in ways that are more violent and direct, such as the genocide of Native Americans and their ways of life upon European settlement in the United States, and sometimes it is more subtle, such as the slashing of music, arts, and physical education in public schools.  These acts and many others are the symptoms of a streamlining effect that has thwarted much of our creative and productive potential to the privilege of some, and the detriment of many.

The high level of regard that a formal academic education holds in our society has led to a devaluation of the many other experiences, skills, intelligences, trainings, and expertise outside of the classroom that have throughout history created a synergistic level of richness and depth.

I have recently come to terms with the fact that my particular set of strengths and my chosen professional path is one which society values highly as it fits into the narrowly defined ideals of “success” in financial gain, professional merit, and symbolic milestones; though I will not accept that it is the most ideal.  This is only one particular path, one of billions.  This one works well for me and I feel achieved in my unique path.  The key that I’ve come to understand though is that for one of us to be successful in our hopes, dreams, and passions, we all need to be empowered to succeed in our own.  On a macro and systemic scale, we need to place value on different worldviews in order to draw a full picture and broaden our ideals for a successful livelihood.

These ideas are reminiscent of what the speaker Chimamanda Adichie refers to as “The Single Story”.  We are quite proficient at painting the picture of a whole people based on single ideas of what is or what should be; in doing so we lose sight of the bigger idea, the diversity that truly exists.  I certainly recommend this TED Talk.

I hope that one day my kids and grandkids will grow up with the understanding that each of our strengths is valued and of value in a holistic way.  They will see their voices represented in our media and government and the strengths of our diverse worldviews expressed and considered in making important decisions.

In the meantime, I offer gratitude to the many, many people who have followed their passions and by doing so empowered and enabled me to follow mine; from my family and friends, to the professors and staff, to the construction workers and engineers, to the artists, the farmers, the drivers, the janitors, the painters, etc.  We all need one another and all of our combined intellects in order to succeed.




*Thanks to Shoshi Fein and Sean Crosby for the fun acronyms!

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Florida Governor Rick Scott Wears Tight Jeans


I am wearing jeans today because...
…Or at least he should.

Why, you ask? Well, today is Denim Day, a national event to raise awareness about sexual assault in the U.S.  The holiday is inspired by a court case in the Italian Supreme Court in 1998 that overturned the conviction of a man who had raped a young woman who had been wearing jeans.  The judge wrote that “because the victim wore very, very tight jeans, she had to help him remove them, and by removing the jeans it was no longer rape but consensual sex”.

Today, all around the U.S., people are wearing denim jeans to demonstrate solidarity with this young woman and the many, many survivors of sexual assault who have been blamed or who blame themselves for what happened to them because of something they wore, someplace they were, something they drank, or any of the many other mechanisms of blame that land on the survivors of these crimes.

I’m wearing jeans today to raise awareness that it was NOT her fault in 1998, it was NOT your fault or mine when it happened to us, and there are NO excuses for sexual assault.

--------------

So this might still leave you wondering what Florida Governor Rick Scott has to do with tight jeans. I shall elaborate...

In the midst of April, the beginning of Spring and Sexual Assault Awareness Month, Governor Rick Scott swiftly slashed significant funding from 30 rape crisis centers of Florida. In response to this major cutback, Rick Scott was quoted saying “This new funding of $1.5 million would have been duplicative, since, as a state, we already fund sexual violence programs. There was no information suggesting any needs in this area weren’t already being met”.

The bewildered Florida Council Against Sexual Violence had to pick it’s figurative jaw up off the floor in order to describe to the press precisely how detailed they had indeed been with the governor in explaining the immensity of their current need for funding.  With waiting lists as long as weeks, sometimes months, many survivors of sexual assault in Florida are not receiving the services they need.

Clearly facing an unmet need, Florida is the latest “victim” of a society that exemplifies the profound misunderstanding of the true impact of sexual assault, not only on the individual, but on the community at large.  Governor Rick Scott, who so easily scoffed this budget cut off as a source of unsubstantiated spending, is contributing to a society that places survivors of sexual assault in a perpetual category of other-ness, disconnecting himself (and tragically, the budget that he controls) from the deeply rooted consequences that resonate through our communities in this rape-prone world.

Speaking of which… 

This Denim Day, I call out to our men. Our brothers, fathers, partners, and friends… This month is your time to speak out and to break the cycle. As Tony Porter so eloquently reflects upon in the TED Talk posted below, it's high time that our men step into action.

In honor of Sexual Assault Awareness Month, I implore everyone to take a moment, watch the video below, wear your jeans with purpose and pride, and rise up and reflect on our current state and how we can collectively raise awareness and stop the violence.



I hope that one day that you too, Governor Rick Scott, will put on your jeans in solidarity.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

You Just Keep on Hoping They Serve Beer in Hell, Mr. Max


Never have I been so pleased or proud that an organization that I love and respect, Planned Parenthood, did NOT get half a million dollars.

Ick.
Last week Ryan Holiday, financial strategist of the best-selling author Tucker Max, facetiously suggested to the writer that he donate $500,000 to Planned Parenthood in an effort to reduce his tax burden and to clean up his contemptible public reputation in many circles who, you know, respect women. After thinking it over for a few days, Tucker Max agreed.

You see, Tucker Max, author of “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” has found his fame and fortune by writing his real-life stories of chauvinism, excessive alcohol imbibing, targeted and competitive womanizing, and behavior that very easily constitutes sexual assault. The fact that our society so readily and enthusiastically consumes this material, enough to make him a best-selling author is another issue worth discussing… in another blahg though.

I’d like to take a moment to highlight the phenomenal statement of solidarity and steadfast commitment to the principle of the matter by Planned Parenthood. Initially excited by the prospect of a major financial donation in a time of great need (particularly in Texas, the state that was dangerously close to being the home of “The Tucker Max Planned Parenthood Clinic”), our beloved pro-woman organization put a halt to the madness.

A few summers ago, in an effort to familiarize myself with his work, I did indeed read quite a bit of one of his vile volumes. (Know thy enemy.) I plowed through story after story of his “escapades”. 

Here are a few choice quotes from his work:

----------------------------

“Halloween revolves around delicious candy, excessive alcohol, and horny women dressed as sluts. This also describes my vision of Heaven.”—His winning personality.

“There is a girl lying next to me on the bed, shaking me, saying something. She is not happy. She is also not skinny. Or attractive. She may not even be human.”—That last line is particularly repugnant.

“After about 6 shots, she tells me, ‘I think I am getting really drunk. I always do stupid things when I’m drunk.’ Strike up the band, we have a winner.”—No, sir. You will never, ever win.

“How long have you known women? Dude–They’re all whores. Except our mothers.”—Solid message for our daughters here……..

“No seriously, I will probably just come on your back, then get dressed and leave. And I’ll probably break some trinket of yours on my way out, just to show my disdain for you.”—I can’t even sarcastically comment on this one.

--------------------------------

You may not be surprised that I didn’t make it through the whole book. Indeed, right then and there I committed my life to counteracting these despicable, degrading, and destructive messages.

Particularly poignant with regard to Planned Parenthood, we have one more comment from our loathsome friend, “Planned Parenthood would be cooler if it was a giant flight of stairs, w/someone pushing girls down, like a water park slide”—tweeted by Tucker Max in July 2011.

So let me offer my profound gratitude and kudos to Planned Parenthood for taking a stand against this writer and all of the social ills that he represents and encourages. We will not abide by such abhorrent behavior and the promulgation of disrespect and sexual objectification of women in our society. Our honorable Planned Parenthood will not be the dumping grounds for the disreputable Tucker Max to “rehabilitate some of [his] PR”, a sentiment expressed by his strategist Ryan Holiday in his frustrated Forbes.com post.

To help make up for the high-principled sacrifice on Planned Parenthood’s part, feel free to help condone the act and send the message that we don’t need one penny from the reprehensible Tucker Max by donating to Planned Parenthood!



Thanks to Ben for bringing this exciting news to my attention, and to Thesaurus.com for many choice words to describe my feelings about Tucker Max.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Red Fish, Blue Fish


Let’s spend a few minutes thinking about race in our society. And racism.

Tim Wise, a phenomenal speaker and teacher, suggests that more people in our country believe that there is a chance that Elvis might still be alive today than believe that racism is still an issue in society.  (The video linked to "Tim Wise" is an extremely important talk, I cannot recommend it highly enough.)

As a member of the white race in our society, it is far too easy to not ever know that racism remains. Though many believe that we have already fixed this issue through the high-profile activism of the 1960s, I will discuss here my belief that my generation’s general passivity on the issue is a profound piece of the promulgation of the problem which is now not only still immensely part of our daily lives, but is more silenced and masked than times past.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.” –Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., April 16, 1963

As Dr. King so eloquently describes, as long as oppression of any one person still exists, all of us are ultimately negatively impacted. One of the barriers with this issue, though, is that while one group of people experiences oppression, another experiences privilege. A difficult and controversial idea that underlies the issue of ‘isms’ in our society is that to achieve equality in our world, those with the social power need to understand and be aware of that power and the profound and unspoken human cost by which we enjoy it, and indeed, we must ultimately be willing to relinquish some of that power for the sake of creating equality.

The privilege we (white people) enjoy is not always easy to recognize; the deeply rooted nature of it allows for many to not even know that it is there. Or worse yet, to see social privilege and believe that it is solely self-created or a product of one’s own actions, and that those without social power (people of color) are the creators of their own destinies as well. Such denial, such unawareness.

Indeed, having privilege or not is about the schools that we attend and the way we are treated within those schools; it is about the communities we all grow up in and the perspective that that context offers us of the world; it is about the opportunities that are available to each of us and the future that they allow for; it is about the physical and emotional safety we all feel and the impact that feeling can have on our lives; it is about the looks that we receive from other people and the way that they translate into perception of ourselves.

It is about being privileged enough to take these things for granted.

I suggest that to be “colorblind” is far too limiting. The solution to this problem is not to stop acknowledging that we, as a human species, have different shades of skin than one another. Rather, it is to appreciate and RESPECT our rainbow of skin colors and the culture, history, and stories of each individual and their ancestors. It is to increase awareness of one another and our contexts, and to escape the culture of fear that is so perpetuated by negative media outlets, segregated communities, and a reluctance to explore the unknown. It is to recognize and accept the inequities and the privileged culture of supremacy over others that we, as white folks, are raised within at the cost of all others.

It is to constantly strive for a society in which being born in a certain place or with a certain color of skin does not dictate the circumstances and privileges of our lives. 

Rather than only a few minutes, let’s spend a few thoughts everyday on racism... And how to passionately and thoroughly combat it.

In honor of Trayvon Martin, whose crime was no deeper than the color of his skin.

Sunday, February 19, 2012

V-Blahg: In Awe and Reverence of Vaginas


We forget the vagina—All of Us
what else could explain
our lack of awe, our lack of reverence.

From “I Was There In The Room”—The Vagina Monologues

The season is upon us.  As you read this, all around the world, thousands of groups of activists are organizing, collaborating, creating, directing, and talking about The Vagina Monologues for their upcoming performances and surrounding V-Week events.

For those of you who have yet to have the pleasure of seeing a production of this show, the series of monologues written by Eve Ensler are based on her collection of interviews of many different women from all around the world.  Set out with the goal of bringing out the stories and issues that make up the complex and unspoken world of female sexuality, Eve’s production, The Vagina Monologues, raises a wide breadth of topics encompassing both the pleasure of womanhood and sexuality, and the danger that sometimes accompanies it.

The first time that I saw the Vagina Monologues, the entire show was performed by four women, each taking turns telling the different stories with different voices and personas.  I left feeling stunningly empowered, inspired, proud, and like I was part of a community that I had not known existed prior to seeing this show.  Having previously believed that the experiences and thoughts that I had around my own sexuality and my... vagina... were unique and that I was alone in these thoughts, the Vagina Monologues brought to light the notion that every one of us has a complex relationship with these difficult and interesting topics.  The show brilliantly highlights the profound joy, pleasure, and beauty of being a woman, while at the same time delving into the frustrations, the pain, and the trauma that far too many of us throughout the world experience.

I’ve found that this year’s script is particularly heavy, as a reflection of the current state of sexual assault in our world.  How is it, I wonder, that this epidemic of rape and sexual assault lives on so strongly and so silently to this day.  Indeed, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just recently released the research results that reveal the immense prevalence of sexual assault in our society.  The CDC reports that 1 in 5 women will experience sexual assault, and (even more rarely discussed) that 1 in 7 men will experience violence in their lifetimes… a shocking and sobering set of statistics.***

V-Day and The Vagina Monologues, a global movement against sexual assault all around the world entering its 15th year of activism, is one of the most effective and proactive grassroots movements that I know of.  Through entertainment, education, and awareness-raising, Eve Ensler and the many people who create this show each year, work towards the essential paradigm shift that will lead to the end of the violence.

This year over 5,000 productions of the Vagina Monologues are being performed around the world, every one of them donating 75-95% of their proceeds to local organizations that provide services and educate people in the realms of domestic violence and sexual assault, and to the V-Day spotlight cause of the year.  

Of note, the spotlight cause of the last two years, the women and girls of the Democratic Republic of Congo, where rape and abuse against women and girls is used as a strategic tactic of war, has raised enough money to create the City of Joy, a place of empowerment, safety, and community for women who have survived sexual assault and violence.

To the men in the audience (of the show and of this blahg), I hope for you that you experience the show as a source of knowledge and enlightenment and walk away as unfaltering lifelong allies of this cause.  You are vital co-warriors towards the end of this destructive pandemic, this unspoken war.  The change will happen only once everyone embraces that notion.

The Vagina Monologues are a piece of art, a source of power, and an evolving movement towards the end of sexual violence in the world.  Each year the show grows exponentially in its prevalence, and I urge every one of you to give yourself, your community, and the world the benefit of attending a production of The Vagina Monologues in your community this year, (even if you have before, for each year it’s directed differently, has new monologues, and supports an extremely important cause). 

(And, if you happen to be in the New York area, come to the show that I have had the honor of producing and directing at Columbia University Medical Center!)

As one survivor of sexual assault among the millions, I regard V-Day and The Vagina Monologues as our voice in this systematically silenced war, and with every individual and organization that joins the cause, our voice grows louder and more powerful.


I commend the thousands and thousands of Vagina Warriors who perform, produce, attend, and support the Vagina Monologues each year.  And we will keep on… Until the violence stops.


Love your tree. An excerpt from "America the Beautiful".


Thanks to Anna for introducing this Eve clip to me.


*** A clarification of the stated statistic: According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, 1 in 71 men have experienced rape in their lives, while 1 in 7 have experienced physical violence by an intimate partner.

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Planned Parenthood, Susan G. Komen, and Brick Walls


Earlier this week, in a despicable display of caving under the pressure of religious zealotry, the Susan G. Komen Foundation announced that it would no longer give funds to Planned Parenthood that the progressive public health organization used for breast cancer screenings for low-income women.

Now, here I sat, thinking that I was going to have to spend my Friday evening writing a raucous and angry post about how appalling it is that the religious right has so little to do with their time that they will sit around thinking up ways to creatively undermine the organizations in our society that actually care about taking care of people. AND THAT IT WORKS…

But, lo and behold, the Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure Foundation decided that it would reverse its decision and reinstate the $680,000 grant for Planned Parenthood.  This came in response to a massive outcry from the public who, in a display of impressive solidarity with the important mission of the organization, signed petitions and pledged donations that flew in the face of Komen’s decision and ultimately surpassed the amount of money that the Komen foundation grants to Planned Parenthood per year substantially. 

I suppose that can be considered a silver-lining… indeed, Planned Parenthood raised $3 million as part of the reaction.

But, wait… I’m still feeling unsettled, so my raucous Friday evening post is going to take a slightly different turn.

What is it about our country’s political mood right now that allows for this level of intense polarization, to the point that some are willing to sacrifice the health of women through the early detection and treatment of breast cancer (one of the leading causes of death in women)?

Ok, ok, while I don’t agree with it, I accept that there are people who take issue with the controversial topic of abortion.  But what are we coming to when an organization like the Susan G. Komen Foundation, specifically charged with the “race to the cure [of breast cancer]”, feels it necessary to take money away from one of our nation’s leading champions in the prevention of breast cancer, in response to these loud anti-choice bigwigs?

Honestly, someone tell me, how are the two issues connected?  Certainly not in their funding sources through Planned Parenthood, as the organization has made it abundantly clear that the Susan G. Komen funds were used specifically for breast cancer screening services.  Certainly not in their level of controversy, I think we’d be hard pressed to come upon an individual or an organization that is anti-curing breast cancer.  Certainly not… at all related, except that they are both services provided by Planned Parenthood.

So the deal, it seems, according to the extreme conservative viewpoint, is that because Planned Parenthood provides one service that they are not keen on (abortion services, which only accounts for approximately 3% of Planned Parenthood services), we should shut them down completely, without regard for the many, many other essential services that Planned Parenthood provides for people every day throughout our country… The reality is that conservative-minded people are afflicted by breast cancer at the same astronomical rates as liberal-minded people, and Planned Parenthood is always there for them without hesitation and without regard for political ideology.

I look forward to the day that our country will approach specific problems with the goal of bringing the most brilliant and highly qualified minds on the topic at hand (throughout the political spectrum) to one table to create the best possible solutions on behalf of the people they serve.  We need to move away from these stringent and unrelenting brick walls that exist between our political factions so that we can discuss issues with some semblance of sanity.  As we stand now, even an issue as crucial, sensitive, and politically neutral as breast cancer, the cancer that 1 in 8, yes, 12% of women will be diagnosed with in their lifetimes, can be thrown under the bus of our staunch and irrational separation.  How truly sad.


Special shout out to Mollie Williams, a top Komen official who resigned out of protest as soon as the decision to cut ties with Planned Parenthood was made, stating that she did not feel that this decision aligned with Komen’s mission of preventing breast cancer for all women.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Save the Comb! Oh, and the Rest of the Internet Too.


A quick blahg, in honor of the online protests today against SOPA (the Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (the Protect IP Act), two current bills in Congress that will censor what we, the people, can and cannot access on the internet.

Yes, you read that correctly… Anything that a copyright holder deems to be a violation of their copyrighted material can lead to a complete eradication of the website in question without warning or proceeding trial.  It will just disappear.

Yikes.

There is no doubt, people... If passed, this Congress will effectively end the freedom of information on the internet as we know it and we cannot let that happen.

The bills are widely supported by the movie and music industries (which is not too surprising), while they are vehemently opposed by many of the major online sources of information.  The very frightening reality of the issue, as many individuals and corporations, including President Obama, recognize, is that the negative consequences of these bills will reach much further than to those who are intentionally pirating copyrighted materials for financial gain.

Get this… THIS blahg, A Fein Toothed Comb, could be erased from the internet completely because of my proclivity for linking to articles outside of my own page for the sake of enhancing my readers’ knowledge on a particular topic (as I have done all throughout this post).  Unacceptable.

Everyone: SIGN SOMETHING against this horrific attempt to block our freedom of speech! Protect our right to information on the internet! Support the online protests being led by internet giants like Wikipedia and Google!

You know, our freedoms are being challenged far too often by this current Congress and I don’t like it one bit.



In the meantime, I’m going to go backup all of my online writing onto my hard drive.

Monday, January 16, 2012

"Hey You Guys" and Other Male Generics

I have a little bone to pick with the English language regarding male generic terms in the professional world... For example: chairmen, policemen, mailmen, firemen, businessmen, congressmen, etc.  The reality of these titles is that though they once did accurately describe those employed in the positions referred to above, they do not any longer.


I did a little Google experiment to reinforce the point I’m about to make: first I Google image searched “businessmen” (a common umbrella term for all people who work in business) and came up with the image displayed here demonstrating a scene of all men, and many others like it. When I image searched the term “businesspeople”, nearly all of the images looked more like the one posted below, illustrating a much more accurate scene of the current business world which now includes women. (The same is true when I image search firemen vs. firefighters, and policemen vs. police officers.)

These umbrella male-generic terms are outdated and are no longer reflective of the reality of the professional world.  The argument that terms like businessmen and chairmen are meant to include women in this day and age is weak because, quite literally, they do not.  Until we shift the way that we refer to these professions, men will continue to dominate the field, as a self-fulfilling prophecy.  In order to be inclusive of women in professional fields, the language that we use must also include them.

The way we talk is in accordance with the way that we think (and therefore what we expect of ourselves and what others expect of us); and our language is our most powerful tool for change.

While certainly subtle (indeed, likely unnoticed by many), I assert that changing the subconscious use of language is an essential step in the movement towards social equality between men and women.  The language that we use has, what I consider, “a silent impact” on the workplace (and beyond).

Thinking outside of the business world, have you ever noticed that when someone says that a woman is “one of the guys” this is generally understood by both parties to be a compliment of high-esteem.  The person offering this “compliment” usually means that the woman is laid back, easy to talk to, able to speak about compelling topics, and perhaps enjoys a cold beer over a conversation (which, for the record, describes nearly all of the women that I associate with). 

As a side note, while talking about social cues, “you guys” is one of the most common phrases that I hear when referring to a group of people, be it all men, co-ed, or even when addressing a room full of women.

Now, imagine for a moment what would be implied if I were to tell a friend that he was just like “one of the girls”… While this might be intended to say that this man is laid back, easy to talk to, able to speak about compelling topics, sensitive, and thoughtful (which, for the record, describes most of the men that I associate with), more than likely, that man will be quite uncomfortable with the notion, if not outright offended.  He might even feel the need for a cold beer and a football game with the guys to cleanse himself of this ill-gotten "feminine" reputation.

We need to work to move away from the underlying message that to be “masculine” is ideal, and to be “feminine” is inferior, an idea that is constantly reinforced by men, women, and the mass media at large.  One way that we can all do our subtle, yet vital part, is to give regard to the way that we speak and the words that we use to refer to people.

Instead of using spokesman, try using spokesperson; instead of salesman, salesperson; mankind, humankind.  And here’s a real challenge for everyone, instead of “you guys”, try using “you all” (carefully controlling the tendency to let this become “y’all” if that is not a word you are otherwise drawn towards) or even just “everyone”.

When we begin to inundate the professional and social spheres with the use of inclusive language, we can really start to make a change in gender dynamics.  I believe that it is not with malicious intent that anyone uses these generic terms, and it is not with judgment of the ingrained use of language in our society that I write, but instead to introduce the thought of the bigger picture implications every time the opportunity to use more inclusive language arises.